Please ensure JavaScript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility DHR Test for CGD: Efficient Testing in CGD Diagnosis - For HCPs

Test for Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD)

Previously, the nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) test was the recognized diagnostic test for CGD. Relying on light microscopy, the NBT test relies on a subjective analysis of phagocyte nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity.1

The dihydrorhodamine (DHR) test is the most common test for identifying CGD

While some physicians still use the NBT test, it has been largely replaced by the flow cytometric DHR test.1

The DHR test has user-friendly steps and provides standardized and quantifiable results alongside enhanced sensitivity.1

The DHR test produces fewer false-negative results than the NBT test and is known for its2,3:

Checkmark

May distinguish between X-linked and autosomal recessive forms of CGD

Checkmark

Ability to evaluate X-linked carriers possibly at risk for infections

Checkmark

High sensitivity that can detect low levels of NADPH activity

Checkmark

Ability to quantitatively assess residual superoxide production

Testing may help identify patients before a serious infection occurs.

See how timely management of CGD can help

The DHR test has largely replaced the NBT test to diagnose CGD.1

If you suspect CGD, get a DHR Collection Kit at no cost to confirm a diagnosis

What to look for when reading DHR histograms: Examples of pre- and post-activation DHR histograms

X-linked carriers, who are often diagnosed after a diagnosis of a relative with X-linked CGD, must be identified early to prevent disease progression and poor outcomes.4,5

dhr-level-under-20-percent-cgd-infection-risk

An X-linked carrier with a DHR level under 20% is at increased risk of infection.6‡

dhr-level-under-10-percent-cgd-infection-risk

An X-linked carrier with a DHR level under 10% is highly associated with infection.6‡

These values are representations of possible DHR outcomes. Because of heterogeneity in disease severity and genotype, outcomes will vary. Laboratory results typically include percentage (%) of residual oxidative burst values.

See a patient case demonstrating how DHR values may change over time

Review tips for proper use of the DHR Collection Kit

Abbreviations: MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; PMA, phorbol myristate acetate

*PMA is an activator used to stimulate neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity.

Usually a female with a healthy and a mutated allele for gp91phox.

Adapted from Leiding JW, et al (2013)3 and Jirapongsananuruk O, et al (2003).7

Symptomatic autoimmunity does not correlate with DHR levels, but is associated with the carrier state.6

See how to use the DHR
Collection Kit

Discover the importance of testing family members of CGD patients

  • References:

    1. Yu JE, Azar AE, Chong HJ, Jongco AM III, Prince BT. Considerations in the diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7(suppl 1):S6-S11. 2. Kuhns DB, Alvord WG, Heller T, et al. Residual NADPH oxidase and survival in chronic granulomatous disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2600-2610. 3. Leiding JW, Holland SM. Chronic granulomatous disease. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, et al, eds. GeneReviews®. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2022. 4. Choi J, Kane T, Propst L, Spencer S, Kostialik J, Arjunan A. Not just carriers: experiences of X-linked female heterozygotes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Oct;38(10):2757-2767. 5. Hauck F, Koletzko S, Walz C, et al. Diagnostic and treatment options for severe IBD in female X-CGD carriers with non-random X-inactivation. J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Jan;10(1):112-5. 6. Marciano BE, Zerbe CS, Falcone EL, et al. X-linked carriers of chronic granulomatous disease: illness, lyonization, and stability. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;141(1):365-371. 7. Jirapongsananuruk O, Malech HL, Kuhns DB, et al. Diagnostic paradigm for evaluation of male patients with chronic granulomatous disease, based on the dihydrorhodamine 123 assay. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(2):374-379.